Looking for alternatives to Same.new? You’re not alone. While Same.new promises to clone websites and build full-stack apps through AI, many developers have run into reliability issues that make it unsuitable for serious projects. The good news is that several powerful alternatives exist, each with unique strengths that might better fit your needs.
This guide explores the best Same.new alternatives available in 2025, helping you find the right tool whether you’re a solo developer, startup founder, or part of a larger team.
Quick List: Top Same.new Alternatives
Here’s a snapshot of the best alternatives to help you quickly decide:
- Bolt.new – Best for rapid full-stack prototyping with in-browser IDE
- Lovable – Best for non-technical founders who want production-ready apps fast
- v0.dev – Best for generating React/Next.js UI components
- Cursor – Best AI-powered IDE for professional developers
- Windsurf – Best for enterprise teams needing advanced security
- Replit – Best all-in-one cloud IDE with collaborative features
- Softgen – Best for building web apps without coding knowledge
- Hostinger Horizons – Best for integrated hosting and deployment
- Dyad – Best free, local, open-source option
- DronaHQ AI – Best for internal business applications
Understanding Same.new: What It Does and Why You Need Alternatives
Same.new is an AI-powered platform that attempts to clone websites pixel-perfectly and build full-stack web applications from simple prompts. The tool uses Next.js, analyzes website structures, and generates React code with Tailwind CSS styling.
Sounds impressive, right? But here’s the reality based on user feedback.
The Problems with Same.new
Users consistently report several critical issues that make Same.new unreliable for professional work:
File corruption during basic operations. Multiple users report that simple tasks like reordering sections can destroy entire codebases with over 1,500 lines of working code. When your platform can’t handle a 30-second change without breaking everything, that’s a fundamental problem.
No proper version control. When Same.new breaks your code, you can’t easily roll back to a working version. Users have expressed frustration about losing hours of functional work because the platform lacks safeguards against destructive operations.
Credit consumption issues. The credit system can drain quickly, especially when the platform gets stuck or fails to complete builds. Users report buying multiple credit packages ($25, $50 per month) only to have credits consumed by failed attempts rather than successful builds.
Incomplete builds and freezing. The platform often partially completes tasks, constantly restarts servers, or freezes without clear feedback about what’s happening. This unpredictability makes it impossible to plan development timelines.
The consensus among experienced developers is clear: Same.new has potential but isn’t ready for serious development work. You need tools you can trust with your codebase.
Best Same.new Alternatives in 2025
1. Bolt.new – The Developer-Friendly Powerhouse
Bolt.new stands out as one of the most reliable alternatives for turning ideas into working applications.
What makes it different: Bolt.new provides a complete browser-based IDE powered by WebContainers technology. You can write code, run applications, install packages, and deploy everything without leaving your browser.
Key features:
- Full-stack generation from natural language prompts
- Support for popular frameworks (Next.js, Vite, Astro, Svelte, Vue, Remix)
- In-browser code editing with AI suggestions
- NPM package installation and backend configuration
- One-click deployment to platforms like Netlify
- Real-time preview and testing
Pricing structure:
- Free tier: 150,000 tokens daily, 1 million tokens monthly
- Pro: $20/month for 10 million tokens
- Standard: $50/month for 26 million tokens
- Power: $100/month for 55 million tokens
- Ultra: $200/month for 120 million tokens
Best for: Developers who want rapid prototyping with the flexibility to manually edit code. It’s particularly good if you value having a full IDE experience in your browser.
Real-world performance: Users report that Bolt.new consistently delivers cleaner UI/UX compared to alternatives. The token-based pricing gives you more control over costs compared to message-based systems.
2. Lovable – Build MVPs Without the Technical Debt
Lovable takes a different approach by focusing on getting founders from idea to live app as quickly as possible.
What makes it different: Lovable emphasizes simplicity over complexity. You describe your app in plain language, and it generates the UI, backend, and database schema with minimal technical knowledge required.
Key features:
- Prompt-to-app generation with full-stack output
- Visual editor for drag-and-drop modifications
- Prebuilt templates for common app types
- Integrated Supabase for authentication and database
- Automatic deployment with one-click launch
- GitHub synchronization for version control
Pricing structure:
- Free tier: Limited usage (5 messages per day)
- Starter: $20/month for 100 edits
- Higher tiers available for increased usage
Best for: Non-technical founders, entrepreneurs, and small teams who need to validate ideas quickly without writing extensive code. It’s ideal when you want something working this week.
Real-world considerations: While the free tier is restrictive, the paid plans offer good value for rapid MVP development. Users appreciate how quickly Lovable handles authentication setup, which normally takes hours to implement manually.
3. v0.dev – Vercel’s React UI Generator
If your main goal is creating high-quality user interfaces rather than complete applications, v0.dev is your answer.
What makes it different: v0.dev specializes in generating production-ready React components with Tailwind CSS. It’s deeply integrated into the Vercel/Next.js ecosystem.
Key features:
- Prompt-based UI component generation
- Seamless Next.js project integration
- Instant Vercel hosting deployment
- shadcn/ui component library
- Designer-friendly iteration workflow
- Easy export to existing codebase
Best for: Frontend developers and designers working with React and Next.js. Perfect for teams already using Vercel hosting who need to accelerate UI development.
Important limitation: v0.dev doesn’t handle backend logic or database generation. It’s purely focused on the frontend, which means you’ll need to connect your own backend services.
4. Cursor – The Professional’s AI IDE
Cursor represents the next generation of AI-powered development environments for serious developers.
What makes it different: Cursor is built on VS Code but supercharged with AI capabilities. It offers precision control, advanced context management, and works with multiple AI models.
Key features:
- AI-driven autocomplete with intelligent code suggestions
- Chat with your codebase using natural language
- Composer for multi-file code generation
- Support for GPT-4o, Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, and Gemini
- Real-time collaboration and pair programming
- Advanced debugging and testing tools
Pricing structure:
- Hobby: Free with 2,000 completions and 50 requests/month
- Pro: $20/month with unlimited completions
- Teams: $40/user/month
- Ultra: $200/month for heavy users
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
Best for: Professional developers and teams who want full control over their development environment. Ideal for complex projects requiring precision and extensive customization.
Why developers choose it: Cursor’s ability to work with multiple AI models lets you pick the right tool for each task. The Composer feature handles complex multi-file edits better than most alternatives.
5. Windsurf – Enterprise-Grade AI Coding
Windsurf (formerly Codeium) brings enterprise-level security and flexibility to AI-assisted development.
What makes it different: Windsurf prioritizes simplicity while offering plugins for over 40 IDEs including JetBrains, Vim, and VS Code. Its Cascade feature provides agent-like functionality with superior context understanding.
Key features:
- Multi-IDE support (VS Code, JetBrains, Vim, and more)
- Unlimited access to SWE-1 model
- Advanced security and compliance (HIPAA, FedRAMP, ITAR)
- Multi-file refactoring with “Vibe and Replace”
- Agent-integrated browser for testing
- Deep codebase analysis
Pricing structure:
- Free: 25 prompt credits with unlimited Fast Tab completions
- Pro: $15/user/month with 500 credits
- Teams: $30/user/month
- Enterprise: $60/user/month with 1,000 credits
Best for: Enterprise teams working on large codebases (100M+ lines) requiring advanced security compliance. Great for regulated industries.
Key advantage: Windsurf is $5 cheaper per month than Cursor while offering more credits for enterprise teams. The multi-IDE support means teams don’t need to standardize on one editor.
6. Replit – The Complete Cloud Development Platform
Replit offers a comprehensive cloud IDE that’s been evolving for years, now enhanced with powerful AI features.
What makes it different: Replit is a mature platform supporting 50+ programming languages with built-in collaboration, AI assistants, and instant deployment.
Key features:
- Full cloud IDE with no local setup required
- AI Agent (Ghostwriter) for code generation
- Real-time collaboration and pair programming
- Support for frontend and backend development
- One-click deployment and hosting
- Extensive template library
Pricing structure:
- Free (Starter): $0 with 10 public apps, 1200 minutes
- Core: $20/month (annual) or $25/month (monthly) with full Agent access
- Teams: $35/user/month
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
Best for: Learning, rapid prototyping, and small team projects. Excellent for educational purposes and developers who want everything in one place.
Unique selling point: Replit’s maturity as a platform means better stability and more resources for troubleshooting compared to newer alternatives.
7. Softgen – AI-Powered No-Code Development
Softgen focuses on making app development accessible to everyone, regardless of technical background.
What makes it different: Softgen translates everyday language into fully functional web applications with modern tech stacks (Next.js frontend, Firebase backend).
Key features:
- Natural language to app conversion
- Automatic development roadmap creation
- Full-stack capabilities with modern frameworks
- Built-in integrations for payments, email, and authentication
- Secure user authentication options
- Structured data storage and querying
Best for: Complete beginners and entrepreneurs who want to build and launch quickly. Users report going from idea to paying customers in just 8 days.
User feedback: Softgen receives praise for being more versatile than Bolt.new and Lovable, with users claiming it “blows them out of the water” for those without coding experience.
8. Hostinger Horizons – Build and Host in One Place
Hostinger Horizons combines AI app building with integrated hosting from a trusted provider.
What makes it different: Built by Hostinger (serving 4M+ clients globally), Horizons offers the convenience of building and hosting in the same platform with built-in security features.
Key features:
- Prompt-based web app creation
- Integrated hosting with DDoS protection
- Built-in malware scanning and firewall
- Easy subdomain setup
- Automatic deployment pipeline
- Code optimization and server configuration
Pricing structure:
- Plans start at approximately $7-$80/month depending on tier
- 12-month commitments offer significant savings
- Includes hosting, security, and AI app building
Best for: Users who want simplicity and don’t want to manage separate hosting. Good for those already familiar with Hostinger’s ecosystem.
Key benefit: The integrated approach means fewer moving parts to manage, which reduces complexity for non-technical users.
9. Dyad – Free, Local, and Open Source
Dyad stands apart as the only truly free and local alternative in this list.
What makes it different: Dyad runs entirely on your computer with no vendor lock-in. You can use any AI model with your own API keys, and all code stays on your machine.
Key features:
- Completely free and open source (16.3k GitHub stars)
- Runs locally with full privacy
- Works with any AI model (Gemini 2.5 Pro, GPT-5, Claude Sonnet 4.5)
- Supabase integration for Auth, Database, and Server Functions
- Use with any IDE (VS Code, Cursor, etc.)
- Supports local models via Ollama
- Real-time preview and instant feedback
Best for: Developers who value privacy, want full control over their data, or need to work with sensitive codebases that can’t be sent to cloud services.
Major advantage: No recurring costs, no usage limits, and no vendor dependency. Your development environment works offline and stays private.
10. DronaHQ AI – Internal Tools Specialist
DronaHQ AI targets a specific but important niche: building internal business applications quickly.
What makes it different: DronaHQ focuses exclusively on internal tools, admin panels, and business applications rather than consumer-facing apps.
Key features:
- Pre-built components for business applications
- Database connector integration
- User interface builder with drag-and-drop
- Workflow automation capabilities
- Role-based access control
- Enterprise-grade security
Best for: Operations teams and businesses that need internal tools like admin panels, employee directories, or data dashboards.
Practical use case: Users report creating functional HR employee directory apps in minutes, which would traditionally take backend and frontend developers several days.
How to Choose the Right Alternative
Selecting the best Same.new alternative depends on your specific situation. Here’s a framework to guide your decision:
Consider Your Technical Skill Level
No coding experience: Start with Lovable, Softgen, or Hostinger Horizons. These platforms handle the technical complexity for you.
Some coding knowledge: Try Bolt.new or Replit. You’ll get more control while still benefiting from AI assistance.
Professional developer: Go with Cursor or Windsurf. These tools enhance your workflow without limiting your capabilities.
Evaluate Your Project Type
Quick MVP or prototype: Lovable and Bolt.new excel at rapid prototyping. You can validate ideas in days rather than weeks.
UI-heavy project: v0.dev generates production-ready React components faster than any alternative. Perfect for design-first workflows.
Internal business tools: DronaHQ AI is specifically designed for this use case and offers appropriate features.
Enterprise application: Windsurf provides the security, compliance, and scale needed for large organizations.
Budget Considerations
Free or minimal budget: Dyad (completely free), or start with free tiers of Bolt.new, Cursor, or Windsurf.
Small budget ($15-20/month): Most alternatives offer solid functionality at this price point. Compare Cursor ($20), Windsurf ($15), Bolt.new ($20), and Lovable ($20).
Team budget ($30-50/user/month): Team plans from Cursor, Windsurf, or Replit provide collaboration features worth the investment.
Integration Requirements
Already using Vercel: v0.dev integrates seamlessly with your existing workflow.
Need Supabase: Lovable has built-in Supabase integration that saves hours of setup time.
Multiple IDEs in your team: Windsurf supports 40+ IDEs, avoiding the need to standardize on one editor.
Require offline work: Dyad runs locally and works without internet connectivity.
Privacy and Security Needs
Regulated industry: Windsurf offers HIPAA, FedRAMP, and ITAR compliance.
Sensitive code: Dyad keeps everything local with no cloud dependencies.
Standard security: Most alternatives (Cursor, Bolt.new, Lovable) provide adequate security for typical use cases.
Comparison: Same.new vs Top Alternatives
| Feature | Same.new | Bolt.new | Lovable | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | Poor (file corruption issues) | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Excellent |
| Version Control | Limited | Built-in | GitHub sync | Advanced | Advanced |
| Pricing | $25-50/month | $20-200/month | $20/month | $20-200/month | $15-90/month |
| Learning Curve | Medium | Low-Medium | Low | Medium-High | Medium |
| Best Use Case | Website cloning | Full-stack prototypes | MVPs for non-developers | Professional development | Enterprise applications |
| Community Support | Limited | Growing | Active | Very Active | Active |
| Code Ownership | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Real User Experiences: What Developers Actually Say
Understanding how these tools perform in real-world situations helps cut through marketing claims.
Bolt.new User Feedback
“I used Bolt.new to build a video transcription app and was impressed by the speed and clean output. The diff tool is excellent for minimizing token usage during iterations.”
“Bolt.new produces better UI/UX than other tools I’ve tried. The in-browser IDE feels polished and responsive.”
Lovable User Feedback
“I asked Lovable to ‘please add user auth’ and it was done in 1 minute using modern Supabase React SDK. Normally this takes me a couple of hours.”
“The free tier (5 messages per day) is too restrictive to build anything useful. But the $20 starter plan is reasonable for rapid MVP development.”
Cursor User Feedback
“Cursor’s Composer handles multi-file edits better than anything else I’ve tried. The ability to switch between different AI models depending on the task is invaluable.”
“The Pro plan at $20/month is worth it. I effectively have an AI partner that understands my entire codebase and helps with complex refactoring.”
Windsurf User Feedback
“Windsurf found the right file on the first try, while Cursor needed additional prodding. For complex codebases, Windsurf’s context awareness is superior.”
“The $15/month price point makes Windsurf attractive, especially with unlimited access to their SWE-1 model. Good value for enterprise teams.”
Dyad User Feedback
“Dyad completely changed how I build web interfaces. Best of all, it’s local and free. No subscription fees, no usage limits.”
“I built a poker game with Dyad and it worked very well. The developer is actively adding enhancements and fixing bugs.”
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Learning from others’ mistakes saves time and frustration. Here are issues to watch for:
Over-reliance on AI Generation
AI tools accelerate development but don’t eliminate the need for understanding what you’re building. Review generated code, test thoroughly, and understand the architecture. Blindly accepting AI output leads to technical debt.
Ignoring Platform Limitations
Each tool has constraints. v0.dev doesn’t handle backends. Same.new has reliability issues. Lovable can be expensive with restrictive free tiers. Choose a tool that matches your project requirements, not just the one with the flashiest marketing.
Underestimating Learning Curves
Even no-code tools require time to learn effectively. Budget time for experimentation, especially with tools like Cursor or Windsurf that offer extensive customization options.
Not Planning for Scale
Start-ups often need to scale quickly. Ensure your chosen platform supports growth in terms of features, performance, and pricing. Some tools work great for MVPs but become expensive or limiting at scale.
Skipping Security Reviews
AI-generated code needs security review, especially for production applications. Don’t assume AI-written code is secure by default. This is particularly important for apps handling user data or payments.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best free alternative to Same.new?
Dyad offers the most comprehensive free alternative, running entirely on your local machine with no usage limits. For cloud-based options, Bolt.new, Cursor, and Windsurf all offer functional free tiers, though with limitations on usage.
Can these alternatives actually replace traditional development?
For prototypes, MVPs, and internal tools, AI builders can replace significant portions of traditional development. However, complex applications still benefit from experienced developers who can guide the AI and handle edge cases. Think of these tools as force multipliers rather than complete replacements.
Which alternative is best for non-developers?
Lovable and Softgen are specifically designed for non-technical users. Both translate natural language into functional apps without requiring coding knowledge. Hostinger Horizons is another solid choice if you value simplicity and integrated hosting.
How do token-based vs message-based pricing compare?
Token-based pricing (Bolt.new) gives you granular control over resource usage and typically provides more budget predictability. Message-based pricing (Lovable) is more straightforward but can run out quickly during intensive development sessions. Neither is inherently better—choose based on your usage patterns.
Are AI-generated apps production-ready?
Apps generated by tools like Bolt.new, Lovable, and Cursor can be production-ready with proper review and testing. However, you shouldn’t deploy AI-generated code to production without security reviews, performance testing, and quality assurance. AI tools accelerate development, not replace due diligence.
Can I migrate my code between platforms?
Most alternatives provide standard code (React, Next.js, etc.) that you can export and use elsewhere. Bolt.new, Lovable, Cursor, and Windsurf all support code ownership and export. Avoid platforms that lock you into proprietary formats.
Which tool is best for team collaboration?
Cursor offers strong real-time collaboration features with session sharing. Replit excels at collaborative coding with multiple team members working simultaneously. Windsurf works better for teams using different IDEs since it supports 40+ editors.
How much does it cost to build an app with these tools?
Basic MVPs can be built for $20-50/month using most platforms’ starter tiers. More complex applications requiring extensive AI usage might cost $50-200/month. Dyad is completely free but requires your own AI API keys (which add separate costs based on usage).
Do these tools work with existing codebases?
Cursor and Windsurf excel at working with existing codebases through advanced context management. Bolt.new and Lovable focus more on new projects but can integrate with existing code. v0.dev generates components that easily integrate into existing React/Next.js projects.
What happens if the AI generates buggy code?
All platforms allow manual editing of AI-generated code. Tools like Cursor and Windsurf include debugging features and can help fix errors. Platforms like Cline (an extension) can even test and fix its own bugs automatically. Always test AI-generated code before deploying to production.
Conclusion: Moving Forward with Confidence
Same.new introduced exciting possibilities for AI-powered web development, but reliability issues make it unsuitable for professional work. The good news? The alternatives outlined in this guide offer more stable, feature-rich options for every skill level and use case.
For rapid prototyping, Bolt.new delivers consistent results with a powerful in-browser IDE. Non-technical founders find success with Lovable’s straightforward approach to MVP development. Professional developers appreciate Cursor’s precision and control, while enterprise teams rely on Windsurf’s security and compliance features.
The right choice depends on your specific needs: technical skill level, project complexity, budget, and integration requirements. Most platforms offer free tiers—use them to test functionality before committing to paid plans.
Start with one tool that matches your current needs, but don’t hesitate to experiment with others as your requirements evolve. The AI development landscape moves fast, and today’s newest tool might become tomorrow’s industry standard.
Whatever alternative you choose, you’ll likely find it more reliable than Same.new while gaining features that accelerate your development workflow. The future of web development is here—it’s just more stable than Same.new promised.
Ready to start building? Pick your alternative, sign up for the free tier, and test it with a small project. You’ll quickly discover which tool fits your workflow best, and you’ll be building reliable applications faster than you thought possible.